Date: 05 February 2021

ATTENDANCE LIST for 2nd MEETING

• 1. Welcome of Participants
• 2. Presentation of Agenda
• 3. Presentation of Project Description
• 4. Presentation of Intellectual Outputs
• 5. Presentation of Intensive Programs (IP)
• 6. Presentation and Discussion of Dissemination and Exploitation
• 7. Closing

Participant	First Name	Last Name	Country	University	Signature
1	Osman	Titrek	Turkey	Sakarya Univ
2	Mustafa	Bayrakçı	Turkey	Sakarya Univ
3	Gözde	Sezen Gültekin	Turkey	Sakarya Univ
4	Ömer Faruk	Vural	Turkey	Sakarya Univ
5	Hikmet	Titrek	Turkey	Sakarya Univ
6	Carlos Sousa	Reis	Portugal	Coimbra Uni
7	Michele	Biasutti	Italy	Padova University
8	Federica	Labbadia	Italy	CSCS
9	Irvna	Puschak	Italy	CSCS
10	David	Rae	England	De Monfort Uni
11	Malcom	Hoare	England	De Monfort Uni
12	Linda	Pavitola	Latvia	Liepaja Uni
13	Ilze	Mikelsone	Latvia	Liepaja Uni
14	Jana	Grava	Latvia	Liepaja Uni
15	Felix Angel	Popescu	Romania	Oradea Agora Uni
16	Dan	Petrica	Romania	Oradea Agora Uni
17	Jose	Gijon	Spain	Granada Uni
18	Lauren	Petrila	Romania	Oradea Agora Uni
19	Giovanni	Crisona	Italy	CSCS
20	Enrico	Valori	Italy	CSCS

DETAILS

Welcome of Participants

The meeting lasted for 4 hours via Zoom Platform. All the partners participated in the meeting. Since the participants met at the first meeting, it was started directly with the schedule.

Presentation of Agenda

The agenda was presented with the participants. In this context, the topics and the points to be discussed were shared.

Presentation of Project Description

In this step, the activity descriptions, the project context and objectives, the expected results of the project and the project expected impacts on participants were addressed and discussed. In this context, firstly, the project activities which are need analysis, curriculum development, ICT-based educational materials, organizing IP programs, publishing e-books, organizing international conferences were introduced briefly. Secondly, the important notes about project were shared. Thirdly, the questions were answered briefly since the details about the activities would be addressed in the further presentations. Fourthly, the aims, context, objectives, expected results and expected impacts of the project were shared. Lastly, the key points were underlined with the participants.

Presentation of Intellectual Outputs

In this step, the intellectual outputs of the project were introduced and discussed in detail. All of the participants expressed their opinions on the outputs. In this context, the following points were discussed:

Related to the need analysis output, the content was reviewed and its method was discussed. The method was defined as SWOT analysis, and it was approved. Also, it was come to a consensus that each partner would create a national report by interpreting the findings of the need analysis. At this point, the participants underlined the question of “what and how to develop this curriculum was discussed”. In this context, the topics were addressed as creativity and entrepreneurship. For the method, Budapest Agenda Instrument was suggested by the partners to evaluate the related topics. Also, it was stated that this instrument should be adapted to the native languages of the partners. For this adaptation, the statistical processes were discussed basically and a sample size calculator was suggested by one of the partners. In this context, the base lines for how to evaluate creativity and entrepreneurship were defined. The details will be discussed in the next meetings.

Related to the e-book output, the topics and other details were reviewed. Then, the necessity of this output was discussed since one of the partners did not want to do it. Upon this rejection, why e-book was a necessary for this project and what its benefits were for dissemination were explained by the other partners. After these explanations, making the e-book output was accepted by all the partners. The details will be discussed in the next meetings.

Related to the curriculum development output, the topics for curriculum were reviewed and evaluated. The method was agreed as Taba-Tyler Approach. Also, the details of the process were shared and all the partners were approved the steps. The details will be discussed in the next meetings.

Related to the conference proceeding books outputs, the details and expectations were shared. At this point, some of the participants accepted these outputs are necessary while some of them thought that it can be transformed an e-book for conference. After this discussion, why conference proceeding books were essential for the project was explained by different partners, and also the e-book suggestion was accepted. In this context, all of the partners accepted that two conference proceeding books and two e-books will be made for these outputs. The details will be discussed in the next meetings.

Related to the online education course platform, materials and movie outputs, the aims, action steps and work divisions were shared. Then, the participants discussed the details. The Basecamp Platform which was created for this project by CSCS was introduced the partners. The participants registered and entered into this platform during the meeting and CSCS introduced how it works. That this output requires at least two video shooting for 30 minutes for each video was rejected by CSCS because of the technological issues. CSCS explained that video shooting for 30 mins requires very big area for database. For this reason, CSCS suggested that some mini-interview videos can be shot instead of big 30 mins-videos. This idea was discussed by the partners and all agreed that it was logical and the details would be discussed in the next meeting.

Presentation of Intensive Programs (IP)

In this step, the situation whether it was possible to make these intensive programs (IP) can be made face to face or not. So, the IPs were introduced and discussed for now.

Presentation and Discussion of Dissemination and Exploitation

In this step, the steps for dissemination and exploitation were introduced. In this context, all the partners were informed that a web page and social media accounts will be created, and also a brochure should be prepared each month for the project. At this point, one of the partners rejected preparing brochure in each month idea since it will be difficult. However, it was explained why it is necessary for the project. It was also explained that it will not be difficult since all the partners will study on the same template by helping each other. The details will be discussed in the next meetings.

Closing

After all the presentations were shared and discussed, the decisions which were accepted by all the partners were remembered again and the points which will be addressed in the next meeting were indicated. Accordingly, the meeting was completed. You can see some photographs from 2 nd meeting ;